EPC publishes ‘Guidance for SEPA Direct Debit Business to Business (SDD B2B) Scheme Mandate Confirmations’. This document is addressed to payment service providers participating in and creditors collecting payments under the SDD B2B Scheme. 15-10-2014
In October 2014, the European Payments Council (EPC) published the document ‘Guidance for SEPA Direct Debit Business to Business (SDD B2B) Scheme Mandate Confirmations’. This document addresses the SDD B2B mandate confirmation requirements and operational implementation thereof prescribed in the SDD B2B Rulebook. The guidance aims to support scheme participants, i.e. payment service providers that have formally adhered to the schemes, to comply with the mandate confirmation requirements defined in the SDD B2B Rulebook.
The SDD B2B Scheme enables business customers in the role of debtors (payers) to make payments by direct debit. Services and products based on the SDD B2B Scheme are only available to businesses; the debtor must not be a private individual (consumer). In the SDD B2B Scheme the debtor (a business) is not entitled to obtain a refund of an authorised transaction.
The SDD B2B Scheme requires the debtor bank, (the bank of the payer), to ensure that the collection is authorised by checking the collection against mandate information. A mandate is signed by the debtor to authorise the creditor to collect a payment and to instruct the debtor’s bank to pay those collections. The debtor bank and the debtor are required to agree on the verification to be performed for each SDD B2B collection.
This means: the debtor bank must check whether or not a valid mandate is in place prior to executing an SDD B2B collection. The debtor bank has to obtain confirmation from the debtor on the SDD B2B mandate data received as part of the first SDD B2B collection prior to debiting the debtor’s account.
The document also reiterates that each SDD mandate is identifiable based on the ‘unique mandate reference’. This mandate reference is assigned by the creditor (biller). It is recommended that the creditor indeed assigns unique, i.e. distinct, mandate references to separate mandates signed by the same debtor to authorise collections under the SDD Core and the SDD B2B Schemes, respectively. The risk of not following such practice is that debtors who wish to block a collection by providing the unique mandate reference will block all other direct debits having the same mandate reference.
Last but not least, the document identifies SDD B2B mandate confirmation practices that are outside the scope of the SDD B2B Scheme.
Observing the principles reiterated with this EPC guidance document should contribute to reducing the occurrence of R-transactions under the SDD B2B Scheme triggered in the event that the debtor bank does not obtain the required mandate confirmation from the debtor. (Possible exceptions to the normal execution of a direct debit collection include, for example, returns, rejects, refusals and reversals, commonly referenced as ‘R-transactions’ and described in detail in the SDD Rulebooks.)