Issue 2 - April 2009
Legal and Regulatory Issues
A mixed BagEuropean Parliament approves revised Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments
24.04.09 By Séverine Anciberro
On 24 April 2009 the European Parliament approved a proposal modifying and extending the provisions of Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in euro, whereby banks are not permitted to impose different charges for domestic and cross-border payments or ATM withdrawals in the EU. Main changes include: the extension of price parity requirements to direct debits; rules on multilateral interchange fees for direct debits and mandatory reachabillity for SEPA Direct Debit collections in the euro area from 1 November 2010 onwards. Missing out on a golden opportunity, the European legislator failed to include provisions on phasing out balance of payments reporting requirements. These reporting requirements, however, violate the principles governing the realisation of SEPA. The revised Regulation will be directly applicable in all Member States as of 1 November 2009. Séverine Anciberro provides the details.***
Scroll to the end of the page and post a comment. Go to comments.
Revised Regulation 2560/2001: impact on pricing and reachability
Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in euro was adopted in December 2001. Its provisions prohibit banks to impose different charges for domestic and cross-border payments or ATM withdrawals in the EU-27. Regulation 2560/2001 has also generally been understood as a turning point in the financial integration policy of the European legislator: beyond its formal stipulations, the Regulation at the time of its inception was also clearly intended to shock the banking sector into stepping up its efforts to achieve the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA).
The revised version of the Regulation approved by the European Parliament on 24 April 2009 introduces additional provisions which - in the eyes of the regulator - further promote EU financial integration in general and SEPA implementation in particular. Whether legislative intervention to this extent is desirable from anybody's point of view may be debatable; the fact of the matter is, at any rate, that the revised Regulation will have significant impact due to the introduction of the following provisions: (1) the price parity requirements are extended to direct debits; (2) the setting out of clear rules for transaction-based multilateral interchange fees until November 2012; (3) banks in the euro area are mandated to become reachable for SEPA Direct Debit collections from November 2010.
Pending the expected confirmation of the proposal by the Council in May 2009 the revised Regulation will be applicable in all Member States from 1 November 2009 onwards.
Extension of the price parity requirement to direct debits
The principle of price parity with regard to domestic and cross-border transactions so far only applied to credit transfers and card transactions. The revised Regulation extends the price parity to direct debits executed under existing national direct debit schemes and cross-border direct debits executed under the new SEPA scheme. Extending the price parity in this manner is based on the flawed assumption of legacy direct debit services and SEPA Direct Debit services being comparable which in fact they are not. Instead, the price offering should have been left to the competitive space, bearing in mind that it is in the interest of each payments services provider to attract customers to the new SEPA instrument.
Rules for charging multilateral interchange fees (MIF) for direct debits
Article 5a of the revised Regulation provides that:"In the absence of any bilateral agreement between the payment service providers of the payee and of the payer, a multilateral interchange fee of 0.088 EUR, payable by the payment service provider of the payee to the payment service provider of the payer, shall apply for each cross border direct debit transaction, executed before 1 November 2012, unless a lower multilateral interchange fee has been agreed upon between the payment service providers concerned". Article 5b of the revised Regulation also regulates interchange fees for national direct debit transactions.
The EPC recognises that the principles outlined in a joint statement of the European Commission and the European Central Bank of 24 March 2009 as regards multilateral inter-bank fee arrangement for SEPA Direct Debit as of November 2012 will affect the SEPA banking communities differently due to the fact that banks' existing direct debit business models vary from country to country*. This means that some communities are confronted with the obligation to adapt their current direct debit business model significantly as of November 2012.
Establishment of mandatory availability ("reachability") of payment accounts for direct debit payments across the European Union
The use of direct debit is conditioned to the reachability of payment accounts across the European Union as of November 2010. For Member States which have not yet adopted the euro, the rules on mandatory availability will apply a year after their entry into the euro area, but no later than 2014. In other words, Regulation 2560/2001 now mandates banks to become reachable for SEPA Direct Debits as detailed above.
Failure to repeal balance of payment reporting requirements
The proposal regarding revision of Regulation 2560/2001 first published by the European Commission on 15 October 2008 included a sunset clause stipulating that "with effect from 1 January 2012 at the latest, member states shall remove settlement-based national reporting obligations on payment service providers for balance of payments statistics." In line with the Commission's proposal and in view of the objective to establish a single payments market (SEPA) with harmonised legislation and practices across Europe, the payments industry and its users strongly supported inclusion of this sunset clause in the revised legislation.
Due to opposition from a blocking minority of Member States (Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Bulgaria and Rumania), however, this sunset clause was removed from the final legislative text. The failure of the European policy maker to commit to the removal of balance of payments reporting obligations in the foreseeable future violates the principles governing the realisation of SEPA and undermines the aim of establishing a level playing field as regards the provision of payments services. The difference in reporting requirements imposed on banks in EU Member States create different cost structures for payments business: the costs incurred as a result of complying with such requirements are borne in full by banks which face heavy competition constraints as a result.
It is particularly regrettable that the failure to set an end date for the abolition of these reporting requirements stems primarily from the refusal of National Central Banks in the above mentioned Member States to reform outdated methodologies to gather data used to compile national balance of payment statistics. This attitude is unacceptable considering that (a) the ECB / Eurosystem claim to be a principal catalyst of SEPA and (b) the Regulator including the ECB / Eurosystem has no qualms about requiring payments services providers and their customers to implement massive changes in order to achieve the integration of euro payments markets.
Then again - what's new?
* The joint statement of the European Commission and of the European Central Bank of 24 March 2009 is available at http://www.ecb.int/press/pr/date/2009/html/pr090324_1.en.html
Séverine Anciberro is an adviser in the Retail Financial Services/Legal and Social Affairs department of the European Banking Federation.
Other articles in this issue
24.04.09 Update EPC Plenary Meetings - Main decisions taken in March 2009 By Herman Segers 24.04.09 The Preview - Rulebook Release Management 2009 By Christian Westerhaus 24.04.09 SEPA only: the EPC Vision - EPC recommendations on end date for SEPA migration By Gerard Hartsink 24.04.09 New EPC Publications now online - Everything you need to know about SEPA By Meral Ruesing 24.04.09 Going global - The new ISO Creditor Reference By Olli Kähkönen 24.04.09 PSD Implementation: six Months to go - Will Member States meet the deadline? By Ruth Wandhöfer 24.04.09 New Kids on the Block - An introduction to payment institutions By Ruth Wandhöfer 24.04.09 Every Road has got to end somewhere: the Need for a SEPA Migration End Date - Re-emphasised by the European Central Bank By Wiebe Ruttenberg and Monika Hempel 24.04.09 Great Expectations - E-invoicing: time to seize the opportunity By Charles Bryant 24.04.09 Overcoming the Homer Simpson in us - How to create a less-cash society By Leo Van Hove and Leonor Machado 24.04.09 Facing the Facts in April 2009 - EPC tracks progress of SEPA implementation By Herman Segers 24.04.09 Missing in Action, mostly - Public sector lags behind in SEPA implementation By Gerard Hartsink 24.04.09 On Bananas and the Integration of Euro Payments - The SEPA commitment of EU governments By Herman Segers 24.04.09 ECOFIN Council Conclusions: Annual Progress Report on the State of SEPA Migration - European Commission reports on migration by public authorities By Zuzana Kalivodova 24.04.09 SEPA at your Fingertips - The EPC Roadmap for Mobile Payments By Dag-Inge Flatraaker 24.04.09 SEPA Direct Debit: the Green Light - EPC launches SEPA Direct Debit Schemes in November 2009 By Gerard Hartsink 24.04.09 The Doors are open - Guidelines for adherence to the SEPA Direct Debit Schemes are now available By Gerhard Singer 24.04.09 Creditors: Help is here - EPC introduces rules on the use of legacy mandates under the SDD Scheme By Kevin Brown 24.04.09 SEPA B2B Direct Debit: the E-Mandate - Public consultation is going on now By Christian Westerhaus 24.04.09 Think ahead - The SEPA Scheme change management By Christian Westerhaus 24.04.09 More is More - EPC Newsletter for Scheme Participants Herman Segers
If you would like to comment on this article, please identify yourself with your first and last name. Please note that your name will appear next to your comment. Email addresses will not be published. Please note that by accessing or contributing to the discussion you agree to abide by the EPC Newsletter Terms and Conditions, so please read them carefully before doing so.