The ECOFIN asked that the European Commission, in collaboration with the ECB and other actors concerned, assess the need to set a binding end date separately with regard to each SEPA Scheme, taking into account specific preconditions of Member States (e.g. euro zone versus non-euro zone Member States). Moreover, specific needs and interests of end consumers would have to be considered. Finally, different possibilities for setting an end date should be demonstrated, each with its advantages and disadvantages (e. g. EU-regulation, ECB-regulation, national measures).
The market is now awaiting the results of this assessment.
Mandating an end date requires Regulation
The recognises the value of setting a deadline for migration to services. An end date for phasing out legacy euro payment instruments creates awareness, ensures planning security for all market participants and confirms the commitment to making a reality. This view is shared by the European Central Bank as well as the European Parliament. The latter already in March 2009 called on the European Commission to set a "clear, appropriate and binding end date, which date should not be later than 31 December 2012, for migrating to products1." In the view of the , mandating an -wide end date would require regulation.
Political leadership has to materialise now
In December 2009, the ECOFIN also reiterated the importance of and its "support for the full realisation" of , which, in the words of the ECOFIN, aims at achieving "an integrated and competitive internal market for euro payments for the benefit of citizens and businesses". In addition, the ECOFIN expressed its regrets about the fact that almost two years after the successful technical launch of the Credit Transfer (), the percentage of credit transfers in the euro area processed using the new format remains very low and is mostly limited to cross border payments. The ECOFIN "considers it crucial to accelerate the take up of , "especially for national euro payments traffic".
According to the Indicators compiled by the European Central Bank (ECB), the share of Credit Transfers () as a percentage of the total volume of credit transfers generated by bank customers amounts to 5.3 per cent as of November 20092. As previously observed in this Newsletter, the current rate of market uptake comes as no surprise. was not started nor is it designed as a demand-driven process. Bank customers did not ask for the introduction of the euro or for current euro payment instruments to be replaced. Existing payment services are generally viewed to be efficient, secure and cheap. is an EU integration initiative and the progress of roll-out reflects the average timelines required for the implementation of other such major programmes.
However, the data available also clearly indicate that political leadership is required now to ensure successful completion of the process. The process is driven forward jointly by the public and the private sectors. The banking industry cooperating in the has delivered its part. The European legislator has put in place the Payment Services Directive (PSD) which establishes the common legal framework required to achieve . It is now time for the public sector to take the next step. The public authorities that asked for should create the clarity and incentives needed to facilitate the migration of customers to the new payment instruments as requested by the ECOFIN. To make it absolutely clear: no end date, no .
A transformation process of this dimension has to be transparent and predictable. A binding end date established through Regulation would provide such predictability. Any other conclusion would severely misinterpret the situation. It is now up to the political authorities, in particular the national governments represented in the ECOFIN, to make the necessary calls.
Gerard Hartsink is the Chair of the .
Related articles in previous issues of the Newsletter::
1 European Parliament. Resolution on the implementation of the Single Euro Payments Area (). 11 March 2009.
If you would like to comment on this article, please identify yourself with your first and last name. Your name will appear next to your comment. Email addresses will not be published. Please note that by accessing or contributing to the discussion you agree to abide by the EPC website conditions of use.