The New European Decision-Making Landscape: How the European Commissio...

The New European Decision-Making Landscape: How the European Commission Rules Through 'Delegated Acts'

SEPA Regulation empowers the European Commission to mandate technical requirements applicable to SEPA payment schemes

24 May 12

Share This
The Regulation and delegated acts

The 'Regulation Establishing Technical Requirements for Credit Transfers and Direct Debits in Euros', commonly referenced as the 'Single Euro Payments Area Regulation' (' Regulation' for short), stipulates the mandatory deadlines for compliance of euro credit transfer and direct debit schemes with this Regulation. In the euro area, this will be 1 February 2014; in non euro countries, the deadline will be 31 October 2016. Effectively, the Regulation defines the dates for migration to harmonised payment schemes. A payment scheme will have to comply with the technical requirements set out in Article 4a and in the Annex to the Regulation. These technical requirements are applicable to the Credit Transfer ( ) and Direct Debit ( ) Schemes developed by the European Payments Council ( ).

The Regulation delegates power to the European Commission to amend the parts of these technical requirements that are set out in the Annex to the Regulation only (not the elements contained in Article 4a). The will be under the legal obligation to align the and Rulebooks with the technical amendments adopted by the European Commission. All references in this article relate to the version of the Regulation as published by the Council, representing European Union ( ) Member States (the Council) on 16 December 2011 (see link below).1

Background on delegated acts

Delegated acts are a new addition to the decision-making landscape. They were introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, which entered into force in December 2009 and more specifically, by Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Whereas European legislation is adopted by the legislators: the Council of Ministers (made up of representatives of the 27 Member States) and the European Parliament (made up of 754 directly elected members), Article 290 TFEU allows the Council and Parliament to delegate the power to adopt non-legislative acts to the European Commission (the executive body).

Delegated acts are used when the Council and European Parliament choose to delegate to the European Commission the power to adopt measures that they could have adopted themselves as an integral part of the legislation, but in the interests of efficiency chose not to. There can be various reasons for this but in the case of the Regulation, it is because (a) the technical requirements are considered to be precisely that: technical in nature rather than political and (b) delegated acts are more easily amended than legislation that must be passed by the European Parliament and the Council under the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly known as co-decision, see 'related links' below for detailed information on the procedure).

In relation to payments, the possibility of technological and other developments make it highly likely that the technical requirements contained in the Annex to the Regulation will need to be updated. The Council and European Parliament have therefore granted the European Commission the power to do this without the need to trigger another round of negotiations between the legislators.

The Regulation therefore grants the European Commission a quasi-legislative role to amend the Annex to the Regulation in order to take account of technical progress and market developments. The framework within which the powers are to be exercised by the European Commission are defined in Articles 12 and 13 of the Regulation. Power is delegated to the European Commission for a period of five years from the date of entry into force of the Regulation. This could be extended for a further five years, unless the European Parliament or Council opposes it three months before the end of the five year period.

The use of delegated acts is generally still in its infancy and there are institutional question marks about the practical arrangements. A detailed prediction of how the Regulation delegated power will play out is therefore not possible at this early stage. Some broad principles about how the European Commission should proceed have however, been agreed.

Process for adopting delegated acts

Delegated acts do not need to undergo the full legislative process, but are formally adopted by the College of 27 European Commissioners (one from each Member State). A European Commission Communication from December 2009 (see link below), sets out how Article 290 TFEU should be implemented (the '2009 Communication'). For those who follow closely decision-making, a similar 'comitology' procedure existed prior to the Lisbon Treaty and was known as the 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny'.

According to the 2009 Communication, the European Commission intends "systematically to consult experts from the national authorities of all the Member States", except where its preparatory work does not require any new expertise. This consultation will be carried out "in plenty of time, to give the experts an opportunity to make a useful and effective contribution to the Commission". In financial services, the European Commission has committed to continuing to consult experts appointed by the 27 Member States in the preparation of delegated acts, in accordance with established practice. It may also form new expert groups. It is currently unclear what (informal) role the new London-based European Banking Authority ( ) may play in relation to the Annex to the Regulation.

On several occasions, the European Commission has reiterated that it has a lot of autonomy in relation to adopting delegated acts and "experts will have a consultative rather than an institutional role in the decision-making procedure". Indeed, the European Parliament and Council inserted new wording in Recital 22 of the Regulation requiring the European Commission to "carry out appropriate and transparent consultation during its preparatory work [on delegated acts], including with the European Central Bank and all relevant stakeholders". The European Commission issued a declaration in response, stating that it could not accept the new wording of Recital 22 because it was not consistent with what had previously been agreed in relation to delegated acts in a 'common understanding' between the three institutions, i.e. that the European Commission would "carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level".

These tussles between the three institutions are common. Despite delegated acts being intended as a process to speed up decision-making and leave technical decisions to the European Commission, what has resulted, is ever more highly politicised negotiations between the institutions and repeated efforts by the Council and European Parliament to ensure they maintain a tight control over how the delegation of power plays out.

Scrutinising the European Commission's use of the delegated power

It is always the legislators who choose to delegate power, but once it has been granted the European Commission has a fair degree of autonomy in exercising that power. There is however, a role for the Council and European Parliament in scrutinising its use through a right of revocation and / or a right of objection (within agreed time limits). In order to exercise either of these powers of control, the Council must act by a qualified majority and the European Parliament by a majority of its members. In relation to the Regulation, the exact manner in which these rights are to be exercised is set out in Article 13.

In addition, Article 13 stipulates that the European Commission must notify the European Parliament and Council simultaneously "as soon as it adopts a delegated act".

For commentary on the impact of the European Commission's power to amend the Annex to the Regulation on the and Rulebook change management please refer to the article by Chair Gerard Hartsink ' Regulation: European Legislator Mandates Migration to by 1 February 2014 in the Euro Area and Transfers the Responsibility for Scheme management to the European Commission' in this issue of the Newsletter.

Dermot Turing is a Partner in the international financial regulatory team at Clifford Chance. Gail Orton is a Public Policy Advisor in the Clifford Chance public policy practice.

Related links:

Clifford Chance briefing, New EU decision-making landscape: Delegated acts & implementing acts

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing technical requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euros and amending Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 - Approval of the final compromise text, 16 December 2011

Council statement on agreement with European Parliament, 20 December 2011

European Commission statement welcoming agreement by Council and European Parliament establishing SEPA migration end-dates, 20 December 2011

European Commission frequently asked questions on SEPA

Communication from the European Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: Implementation of Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union COM(2009)673

Common Understanding on Practical Arrangements for the use of Delegated Acts, 14 April 2011

For more information on the 'ordinary legislative procedure' (co-decision) governing the European Union legislative process, click here

EPC Blog (17 November 2011): Important Notice to all SEPA Stakeholders: the European Commission Will Assume SEPA Scheme Management

EPC Blog (30 November 2011): SEPA for All: What Customers Want. The EPC Shares Lessons Learnt with the European Commission on How to Align SEPA Payment Schemes with Proven Market Needs

Related articles in this issue:

SEPA Regulation: European Legislator Mandates Migration to SEPA by 1 February 2014 in the Euro Area and Transfers the Responsibility for SEPA Scheme Management to the European Commission. EPC Chair comments on the new regulatory reality governing the integration of the euro payments market

EPC Scheme Change Management 2012 (and Beyond) - Call to Stakeholders: Stay Engaged and Prepare for Impact of SEPA Regulation. Suggestions for changes to SCT and SDD must reach the EPC by end February 2012

The 2012 Payment Services Directive Review: Too Much too Soon? The European Commission must present its report on the application of the Payment Services Directive by 1 November 2012

Reflections on Recent Contributions from the European Commission Directorate General Competition to the Innovation in Payments Debate. Seeking common ground between policy makers and technical experts

Related articles in previous issue(s):

SEPA Regulation: Last Call to Legislators. EPC invites European lawmakers to align Regulation with bank customer requirements (EPC Newsletter, Issue 12, October 2011)

Brave New World: the European Commission Becomes the SEPA Scheme Manager. The EPC offers the regulator some insight on scheme development and rulebook release management (EPC Newsletter, Issue 12, October 2011)

All EPC Newsletter articles published in the 'Legal and Regulatory Issues' section 

1The final text of the 'Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro and amending Regulation (EC) No 924/2009' was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 30 March 2012:

Your reactions

If you would like to comment on this article, please identify yourself with your first and last name. Your name will appear next to your comment. Email addresses will not be published. Please note that by accessing or contributing to the discussion you agree to abide by the EPC website conditions of use.