Measuring the convergence in European retail payments.
Financial integration is important for both the smooth operation and the efficiency of the payment system, and promoting it is also one element of the Eurosystem’s mission1. The Eurosystem comprises the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the European Union ( ) Member States whose currency is the euro. Based on economic theory and empirical evidence, financial integration promotes competition, efficiency and growth. As a result, the convergence of retail payments has many implications for the overall performance of the economy.
In order to promote integration, policy-makers need tools and indicators to measure its level and progress. Even though there are an increasing number of studies on integration in other segments of the financial markets, its level and evolution in the retail payments market has been difficult to measure, and the empirical literature is very limited. With the ECB Occasional Paper ‘Convergence in European retail payments’ (see ‘related links’ below), methods which had been applied previously to measure integration in other segments of the financial markets have been applied to quantify integration in the retail payments market. The paper evaluates the level and evolution of integration by measuring the cross-country convergence of payment behaviours in Europe.
The analysis is based on data on the volume and the value of transactions made in cash, by debit card, credit card, direct debit, credit transfer and cheque, and in e-money, in the then 27 countries of the over the period 1995 to 20112. The present paper is the first to use recent enough data to fully measure the impact of the introduction of the single currency on retail payment integration. Moreover, the study provides some preliminary results regarding the impact of the Single Euro Payments Area ( ) and the recent economic crisis on the integration process.
The study applies two methods to quantify convergence: sigma convergence and beta convergence. The rationale behind sigma convergence is that if countries become increasingly homogeneous over time, the cross-country distribution of transactions should become less dispersed. In estimations, this translates to the standard deviation having a negative time trend, i.e. it decreases over time. Beta convergence is based on the idea of a catching-up process; in countries which start from low-level use of a particular payment instrument, the volume or the value of transactions should grow faster than in countries which start from a higher level.
Based on the findings in this paper, it can be argued that payment behaviours in the 27 countries have become more similar since the introduction of the single currency. However, considerable efforts are still required to further promote this development. Currently there is evidence of cross-country convergence in the euro area with regard to payment behaviours, especially for card payments, direct debits and credit transfers, and the speed of integration has accelerated for most of the payment instruments studied since the introduction of the single currency.
The findings also show that the level of integration depends on the market segment and seems to be sensitive to the overall trends in economic development.
The speed of sigma convergence for cash has been very slow. Moreover, cheques and e-money are exceptions, as countries diverge in their use of these two payment instruments. One possible reason for this lack of convergence could be that there is a negative overall trend in the volume and the value of transactions made by cheque. The divergence result reflects the fact that consumers are making fewer transactions by cheque in most of the 27 countries, while in the remaining countries, cheques are still relatively popular. For e-money, the overall number and value of transactions is increasing. This payment instrument is, however, still in its early stages of development and the total volume and value of transactions is relatively low. Countries differ in terms of the way in which they adopt payment innovations, and the dispersion in the use of e-money across countries is likely to reflect these different adoption patterns.
The recent financial crisis discouraged integration in many segments of the financial markets, especially in money, bond and equity markets. There is also evidence that in banking, cross-border activity declined during the period of financial turmoil. Even though payment behaviours are not likely to be affected by the same factors that led to disintegration in other financial market segments, namely mistrust and increasing differences in country-specific risks, it is nonetheless interesting to note that the convergence in retail payment behaviours has continued regardless of the Europe-wide crisis. However, it is hard to disentangle the effects of and those of the economic crisis on the convergence process, and the present study offers only some preliminary conclusions.
Since economic theory and empirical findings support the fact that integration promotes competitiveness, efficiency and growth, the process of integration should be considered beneficial, even at times of extreme economic uncertainty. Regardless of the positive findings regarding financial integration, it should be noted that payment behaviours are slow to change, and the differences in payment habits across Europe remain significant. The single market for European retail payments has not yet fully materialised and neither have its benefits. This paper may serve as a useful tool for policy-makers and market stakeholders when predicting the future trajectories of the European retail payments market.
Emmi Martikainen is Senior Research Officer at the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority. Heiko Schmiedel is a Senior Expert in the Directorate General Payments and Market Infrastructure at the European Central. Tuomas Takalo is a Research Advisor at the Bank of Finland. He is also a Senior Researcher at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, and an External Advisor at the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority.
The views expressed in this text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ECB nor the Bank of Finland.
Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, then Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank. Speech ‘The Quest for the Holy Grail? - European Financial Integration: Achievements and Hurdles’, 16 March 2009
Related articles in this issue:
SEPA 2014: EPC Calls on European Parliament and EU Governments Represented in the Council of the European Union to Provide Clarity on SEPA Compliance Requirements As Soon As Possible. On 9 January 2014, the European Commission introduced a proposal to effectively postpone the deadline for compliance with Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 from 1 February 2014 to 1 August 2014
University of Barcelona: “Early Migration to SEPA Has Led to More Agile and Effective Account Reconciliation and Faster Processing of Payments”. The University implemented SEPA Credit Transfer in 2008 and will complete migration to SEPA Direct Debit by the end of January 2014
SEPA Facts and Figures (January 2014): “If the Current Pace of Migration Continues, the Vast Majority of Stakeholders Will Complete Their Migration by 1 February 2014,” Says European Central Bank. EPC recommends that organisations in the euro area still working towards achieving SEPA readiness complete the migration process as soon as possible
Related articles in previous issues:
SEPA Fact Check: The SEPA Benefits Projected by EU Governments, the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Central Bank (1999 - 2013). SEPA is an EU integration initiative driven by EU governments and the EU institutions. Note: the European Payments Council is not part of the EU institutional framework ( Newsletter, Issue 20, October 2013)
SEPA in the Context of the Financial Crisis. Retail payments business proves to be resilient. ( Newsletter, Issue 7, July 2010)
Clarity and Incentives Needed. ECOFIN conclusions of December 2009 on setting an end date for migration to SEPA ( Newsletter, Issue 5, January 2010)
Towards a SEPA Migration End Date? Commission services publish feedback on public consultation on possible end date(s) for SEPA migration ( Newsletter, Issue 4, October 2009)
Every Road has Got to End Somewhere: the Need for a Migration End Date. Re-emphasised by the European Central Bank ( Newsletter, Issue 2, April 2009)
Financial Crisis. SEPA can be part of the solution ( Newsletter, Issue 1, January 2009)
1 See “The mission of the Eurosystem” on the ECB’s website (http://www.ecb.int/ecb/orga/escb/html/mission_eurosys.en.html).
2 Croatia joined the in July 2013.
If you would like to comment on this article, please identify yourself with your first and last name. Your name will appear next to your comment. Email addresses will not be published. Please note that by accessing or contributing to the discussion you agree to abide by the EPC website conditions of use.