The free online Newsletter, published quarterly by the European Payments Council ( ), offers information on the Single Euro Payments Area ( ) and activities. The Newsletter January 2014 edition (see ‘related links’ below) focuses on legal and regulatory developments impacting the euro payments market.
The European Commission commented in December 2011 on the agreement by the European Parliament and the Council of the representing Member States on the 1 February 2014 deadline for compliance with the ‘Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro’: “The reasonable transition periods applied will allow customers and banks to get used to the adjustments in domestic payment transactions, provide legal certainty, avoid the cost of operating dual payments systems and bring forward the substantial future benefits of .”
The formal 1 February 2014 migration deadline applies in 17 euro area countries. On 20 January 2014, the European Central Bank stated: “The December  figures show that, if the current pace of migration continues, the vast majority of stakeholders will complete their migration by 1 February 2014.” The latest qualitative SEPA indicators published by the European Central Bank in January 2014 confirm this outlook. The qualitative indicators take into account the specificities of the respective country with regard to migration progress by payment service providers ( ), ‘big billers’, public administrations and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). According to this data, which reflects the assessment of national central banks, it is expected that on 1 February 2014 all , ‘big billers’ and public administrations will be ready. SMEs in 15 euro area countries are expected to achieve -compliance by this date.
To avoid difficulties for market participants in the euro area that have not achieved compliance with Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 on time, the European Commission introduced on 9 January 2014 a proposal to “give an extra transition period of six months during which payments which differ from the format can still be accepted” after 1 February 2014. The co-legislators, i.e. the European Parliament and the government ministers represented in the Council of the , indicated that they intend to finalise the legislative process required to amend Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 as proposed by the European Commission in the course of February 2014.
Consequently, payment service users and providers in the euro area are forced to determine their course of action as of 1 February 2014 based on the assumption that the co-legislators will amend Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 to effectively delay the migration deadline in the euro area to 1 August 2014 and the application of penalties for processing payments that do not comply with this Regulation to 2 August 2014. Market participants will also have to rely on the assumption that a new Regulation amending Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 will “have a retroactive effect as from 31 January 2014” as proposed by the European Commission.
In this edition of the Newsletter, Javier Santamaría, Chair of the European Payments Council ( ), reports on latest related developments and market reactions to this European Commission proposal. The emphasises that once the co-legislators have effectively modified the deadline for compliance with Regulation ( ) No 260/2012 in the euro area, it will be crucial that relevant public authorities clarify the implications to payment service users and providers immediately. It is the responsibility of the public authorities determining the compliance requirements to avoid a situation where uncertainty around applicable legal deadlines would impact ongoing migration efforts and further delay the completion of migration.
This edition also includes the ’s analysis of the European Commission’s proposal for the revised Payment Services Directive ( ). The has identified considerable scope for amendments with regard to the proposed new set of rules related to the activity of so-called third party payment service providers offering payment initiation or payment account information services. The also sees a pressing need for review of the proposed new Article 67, (entitled ‘Refunds for payment transactions initiated by or through a payee’), regarding the details of the unconditional refund right for direct debits. Last but not least, this edition features comment from guest contributors on the implications of the proposed and other regulatory initiatives impacting the euro payments market.
If you would like to comment on this article, please identify yourself with your first and last name. Your name will appear next to your comment. Email addresses will not be published. Please note that by accessing or contributing to the discussion you agree to abide by the EPC website conditions of use.